Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
If I find someone that has reviewed something negative and it's highly ranked I try to point out to them if the game has changed, especially if it's a lesser known title. Sometimes they rereview, other times they get upset.
It's reassuring to know that the problems I described are still present.
I had the achievements for ending A, C and D, plus the <15 minute playthrough and one other.
Could be that Steam invalidates the achievements if you get a refund.
Let me just say that your review is perfectly valid as well. I'm sure I would enjoy the game more if I had the historical context that you seem to have. As someone without that knowledge, however, the game's weaknesses outweigh its strengths.
I can't complain about said things in review, drawbacks you mentioned are real...but how you manage to skip achievements?