Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
If I find someone that has reviewed something negative and it's highly ranked I try to point out to them if the game has changed, especially if it's a lesser known title. Sometimes they rereview, other times they get upset.
It's reassuring to know that the problems I described are still present.
I had the achievements for ending A, C and D, plus the <15 minute playthrough and one other.
Could be that Steam invalidates the achievements if you get a refund.
Let me just say that your review is perfectly valid as well. I'm sure I would enjoy the game more if I had the historical context that you seem to have. As someone without that knowledge, however, the game's weaknesses outweigh its strengths.
I can't complain about said things in review, drawbacks you mentioned are real...but how you manage to skip achievements?