Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
If I find someone that has reviewed something negative and it's highly ranked I try to point out to them if the game has changed, especially if it's a lesser known title. Sometimes they rereview, other times they get upset.
It's reassuring to know that the problems I described are still present.
I had the achievements for ending A, C and D, plus the <15 minute playthrough and one other.
Could be that Steam invalidates the achievements if you get a refund.
Let me just say that your review is perfectly valid as well. I'm sure I would enjoy the game more if I had the historical context that you seem to have. As someone without that knowledge, however, the game's weaknesses outweigh its strengths.
I can't complain about said things in review, drawbacks you mentioned are real...but how you manage to skip achievements?