Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
If I find someone that has reviewed something negative and it's highly ranked I try to point out to them if the game has changed, especially if it's a lesser known title. Sometimes they rereview, other times they get upset.
It's reassuring to know that the problems I described are still present.
I had the achievements for ending A, C and D, plus the <15 minute playthrough and one other.
Could be that Steam invalidates the achievements if you get a refund.
Let me just say that your review is perfectly valid as well. I'm sure I would enjoy the game more if I had the historical context that you seem to have. As someone without that knowledge, however, the game's weaknesses outweigh its strengths.
I can't complain about said things in review, drawbacks you mentioned are real...but how you manage to skip achievements?