商店页面
Stellaris
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

Stellaris

商店页面
Stellaris >  创意工坊 > OnlyKarlos 的创意工坊
404 个评价
(Legacy 3.2) Worthy Ascension Perks
描述 讨论1 留言175 改动说明
2
3
2
2
2
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
Balance, Gameplay, Overhaul
文件大小
发表于
更新日期
573.764 KB
2021 年 4 月 17 日 下午 6:09
2021 年 12 月 3 日 上午 11:19
12 项改动说明 （ 查看 ）
创建者
OnlyKarlos
离线
查看所有 1098 个合集（也许有些被隐藏了）
53,122 不重复访客数
4,257 当前订阅者
940 当前收藏人数

订阅以下载
(Legacy 3.2) Worthy Ascension Perks

描述
Thank you Mute for updating this mod for 3.3.X and 3.4.X.
I've decided to nominate your updates as the new official/updated versions since I'll no longer be working on this mod in the future.



3.2 "Herbert" Update ✔️

Ah, Ascension Perks. Your rewards for finishing entire traditions trees, "defining characteristics that emerge as a product of the socio-cultural evolution represented by the Traditions intertwining with the empire's identity" (wiki).
They're a pretty big deal. Or at least, they should be.

It's pretty common knowledge that not all ascension perks are created equal. Some are extremely valuable, while others are... there... if you ever need them for something.
Let's be honest, we only have so many slots for Ascension Perks, so we should be using them to the maximum. But some of them are not worth picking, let alone considering. So I made them!

I present to you... Worthy Ascension Perks!
Making those neglected Ascension Perks worth your time!

Changes are shown as images on this page.



We have a discussion open to talk about suggestions. Suggestions as regular comments will be ignored.

If you think a Ascension Perk is too overpowered, let me know!
If you think a Ascension Perk is still unworthy, let me know!
If you have any ideas for any Ascension Perks, let me know!
热门讨论 查看全部（1）
1
2021 年 9 月 30 日 下午 5:01
Suggestions for Worthy Ascension Perks
OnlyKarlos
175 条留言
< >
Cuerveria 2023 年 2 月 23 日 下午 2:05 
This mod causes the new traditions to be missing tooltips. Any fix?
The Dank Lord [GER] 2022 年 4 月 17 日 上午 6:35 
was an awesome mod but too bad I can't use it anymore. For some reason this mod creates a bug where the Uplink Node from machine empires don't produce any Unity anymore...
MrFunEGUY 2022 年 4 月 5 日 下午 8:41 
Thanks for originally making this!
OnlyKarlos  [作者] 2022 年 3 月 19 日 下午 2:10 
@ClockworkC0rvus officially and fully abandoned, I don't intend to update it to any future versions.

@Mute you can keep it up and update it to future versions if you want, no need to call it an unofficial update.
mute 2022 年 3 月 19 日 上午 11:53 
https://sp.zhabite.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2781513468
Did an unofficial update to 3.3.* to get rid of the admin cap - unity issues among other things.
@Only Karlos will take this down again if you want
ComradeCorvus 2022 年 3 月 19 日 上午 6:38 
Just wanting to clarify. At the top of the description, it says that the mod is abandoned, but in your last comment you said you will update it when you get some free time to do so, so is it just on hiatus or fully abandoned. I just want clarification, so I can post it in the abandoned mods channel on the Stellaris modding den discord if you don't plan on revisiting it.
JC12231 2022 年 3 月 1 日 下午 12:18 
fair enough, i just wasn't sure why it modified those jobs, i wasn't expecting the mod to be broken in that way, but i guess some ascension perks modify bureaucrats?

i was expecting some things to be broken since its not updated for 3.3, that one just caught me off guard
OnlyKarlos  [作者] 2022 年 3 月 1 日 上午 6:44 
@JC12231 the description says 3.2 "Herbert" Update so it's not updated to 3.3 and the new changes yet. I'll update it when I get some free time to do so.
JC12231 2022 年 2 月 26 日 下午 1:48 
Not entirely sure why, but this mod edits some of the specialist pop jobs, which includes bureaucrat, which now produces Unity instead of Admin Cap, so using this mod currently makes bureaucrats still produce admin cap, which is useless now, instead of unity.

So until the dev fixes that, don't use the mod, or just patch it out manually.
{OG} MasterPiece 2022 年 2 月 8 日 上午 6:34 
Maybe buffing transcendent learning would be sweet?