Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
🎍🎄📀🏀👔🚘📀🏓⛳😺🎫👹🐛🌸🚕
"The argument that the literal story of Genesis can qualify as science
collapses on three major grounds: the creationists' need to invoke
miracles in order to compress the events of the earth's history into
the biblical span of a few thousand years; their unwillingness to
abandon claims clearly disproved,
including the assertion that all
fossils are products of Noah's flood; and their reliance upon distortion,
misquote, half-quote, and citation out of context to characterize the
ideas of their opponents."
-- Stephen Jay Gould, "The Verdict on Creationism",
The Skeptical Inquirer, Winter 87/88, pg. 186
🥗🐳👃💎🎈👽🌳📕👳🌏💗📒👾🌳📘
🚙💛🌋🍇🌸🎁🥗👹🌽🐟📗🏀🕺🐊⚡
█▀█ █▀█ █▀▀ █▀▀ ▀█▀★★★★★
▀─▀ ▀─▀ ▀── ▀── ─▀★★★★★★
█▄─█ █▀▀ █─█─█──█─█ █▀▀ █▀█ █▀█
█─██ █▀▀ █─█─█──▀█▀ █▀▀ █▀█ ██▀
▀──▀ ▀▀▀ ─▀▀▀────▀─ ▀▀▀ ▀─▀ ▀─▀
░░░█████░█████░░███░█████
░░░█░░██░██░██░████░█░░██
░░░░░░██░██░██░░░██░░░░██
░░░░░██░░██░██░░░██░░░██
░░░░██░░░██░██░░░██░░██
░░░██░██░██░██░░░██░██
░░░█████░█████░░░██░██
╔╗╔╦══╦═╦═╦╗╔╗ ★ ★ ★
║╚╝║══║═║═║╚╝║ ☆¸.•°*”˜˜”*°•.¸☆
║╔╗║╔╗║╔╣╔╩╗╔╝ ★ NEW YEAR ☆
╚╝╚╩╝╚╩╝╚╝═╚╝ ♥¥☆★☆★☆¥♥ ★☆❤♫❤♫❤
.•*¨`*•..¸☼ ¸.•*¨`*•.♫❤♫❤♫❤