安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
🎍🎄📀🏀👔🚘📀🏓⛳😺🎫👹🐛🌸🚕
"The argument that the literal story of Genesis can qualify as science
collapses on three major grounds: the creationists' need to invoke
miracles in order to compress the events of the earth's history into
the biblical span of a few thousand years; their unwillingness to
abandon claims clearly disproved,
including the assertion that all
fossils are products of Noah's flood; and their reliance upon distortion,
misquote, half-quote, and citation out of context to characterize the
ideas of their opponents."
-- Stephen Jay Gould, "The Verdict on Creationism",
The Skeptical Inquirer, Winter 87/88, pg. 186
🥗🐳👃💎🎈👽🌳📕👳🌏💗📒👾🌳📘
🚙💛🌋🍇🌸🎁🥗👹🌽🐟📗🏀🕺🐊⚡
█▀█ █▀█ █▀▀ █▀▀ ▀█▀★★★★★
▀─▀ ▀─▀ ▀── ▀── ─▀★★★★★★
█▄─█ █▀▀ █─█─█──█─█ █▀▀ █▀█ █▀█
█─██ █▀▀ █─█─█──▀█▀ █▀▀ █▀█ ██▀
▀──▀ ▀▀▀ ─▀▀▀────▀─ ▀▀▀ ▀─▀ ▀─▀
░░░█████░█████░░███░█████
░░░█░░██░██░██░████░█░░██
░░░░░░██░██░██░░░██░░░░██
░░░░░██░░██░██░░░██░░░██
░░░░██░░░██░██░░░██░░██
░░░██░██░██░██░░░██░██
░░░█████░█████░░░██░██
╔╗╔╦══╦═╦═╦╗╔╗ ★ ★ ★
║╚╝║══║═║═║╚╝║ ☆¸.•°*”˜˜”*°•.¸☆
║╔╗║╔╗║╔╣╔╩╗╔╝ ★ NEW YEAR ☆
╚╝╚╩╝╚╩╝╚╝═╚╝ ♥¥☆★☆★☆¥♥ ★☆❤♫❤♫❤
.•*¨`*•..¸☼ ¸.•*¨`*•.♫❤♫❤♫❤