安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
獎勵
It's likely safe to use though, but the tech costs may be slightly off.
surprise - you mean jump straight to their capital
Jump drives had no disadvantage, the game still converged on jump drives anyway.
Getting rid of everything aside from the Hyperdrive was a terrible idea in my opinion, since it just gives me the feeling that the dev behind that blunder was having a Star Wars fanboy wank or something.
Let me be able to surprise (and be surprised BY) my enemies in my campaigns because my civ and theirs use different FTL methods! It gives more fun and in-depth options when waging a war, since a civ with jump drives can circumnavigate all known systems at the risk of being eaten by the Warp, while hyperdrive-using civs are safe but constrained only to known Hyperlanes.
Isn't that the point of grand STRATEGY games? To have advantages and DISadvantages because of the civ and choices you make?