安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
It's likely safe to use though, but the tech costs may be slightly off.
surprise - you mean jump straight to their capital
Jump drives had no disadvantage, the game still converged on jump drives anyway.
Getting rid of everything aside from the Hyperdrive was a terrible idea in my opinion, since it just gives me the feeling that the dev behind that blunder was having a Star Wars fanboy wank or something.
Let me be able to surprise (and be surprised BY) my enemies in my campaigns because my civ and theirs use different FTL methods! It gives more fun and in-depth options when waging a war, since a civ with jump drives can circumnavigate all known systems at the risk of being eaten by the Warp, while hyperdrive-using civs are safe but constrained only to known Hyperlanes.
Isn't that the point of grand STRATEGY games? To have advantages and DISadvantages because of the civ and choices you make?