Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
It's likely safe to use though, but the tech costs may be slightly off.
surprise - you mean jump straight to their capital
Jump drives had no disadvantage, the game still converged on jump drives anyway.
Getting rid of everything aside from the Hyperdrive was a terrible idea in my opinion, since it just gives me the feeling that the dev behind that blunder was having a Star Wars fanboy wank or something.
Let me be able to surprise (and be surprised BY) my enemies in my campaigns because my civ and theirs use different FTL methods! It gives more fun and in-depth options when waging a war, since a civ with jump drives can circumnavigate all known systems at the risk of being eaten by the Warp, while hyperdrive-using civs are safe but constrained only to known Hyperlanes.
Isn't that the point of grand STRATEGY games? To have advantages and DISadvantages because of the civ and choices you make?