安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
will have 4 times efficiency compared to other tech
Obvious problems after short overview
1.Ship Hull upgrade sounds much needed but logically has to be in engineering
2.Fleet Command sounds more suitable for sociology near Naval Cap and Starbase Cap. The game has 3 similar cap upgrades - Fleet Command, Naval Cap, Starbase Cap. So it's only logical either to put all of them into 1 tree or split them between all 3 trees.
3.Speaking of Starbase Cap +5 total is too underpowered for a lategame super-expensive tech
4.Machines and Lithoids do not benefit from endless +5% food. They need some tech swap.
And also engineering having less repeatable techs does no sound balanced to me
Engineering is intended to be the most tech-heavy tree as it should be, at least make equal number of repeatables.
Think I need a couple games to experience pros and cons to have more to say.
OMG Thanks to let me know.
Also, add a +10% defense platform health to the defense platform damage tech.
In my opinion, it should be more balanced and encourage to use defense platforms in late game more.