Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I look forward to seeing your take on Ys. I mostly use my Double Triangle interchange -- https://sp.zhabite.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2056199123 -- which I think has a certain elegance to it, but it isn't particularly exciting or pretty.
You're right about pretty much everything. With a roundabout interchange it's essential to use TMPE,and even then you're going to be limited because there's only so many vehicles you can get on and off the roundabout. I do have a few more interchanges in my pipeline, based more on the Y branching idea, that was my last roundabout-based one... I think.
One more thing, I just read your Optimal Square Grid guide (https://sp.zhabite.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2035626231) . I'm a big fan of city grids and that was just an excellent read
(Not that I'd personally use it, since I don't think there's ever a good reason to have 6 highways run join like this, and even with TMPE I don't find roundabout-based interchanges have good enough throughput to be used for system interchanges. I think for this I'd just put a Y in the middle, then a Y on each branch of it, with a bit of merging space, rather than fight with the merging on the roundabout.)