安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
It leads to part of the RS code being overwritten.
(rs_battlecruiser
rs_dreadnought
rs_ea_cruiser
rs_heavy_dreadnought
rs_support_cruiser)
That makes sense, the main reason I thought that something may be wrong was thanks to the Machine ship set. With how the the Machine ships were designed the upside down portion on the battlecruiser doesn't' mesh well with the rest of the design. Thanks for the info!
1. He especially hated that vanilla ships look too symetrical, and like "teacups on a plate", only aiming at the upper half-space. This is why some turrets are moved to the bottom of models, or to the sides. Same for carrier section towers. Think about Homeworld starships.
2. Heavy dreadnoughts were designed so that they don't compete with more versatile battleships (to not make them obsolete fast). They are heavy-ordinance only titan-like artillery ships, and are handy for players who don't have the titan DLC (as well as EW cruisers for auras).
These are the sections that I have noticed upside down:
Machine ship set - battlecruiser 3rd section
Humaniod ship set - battlecruiser 1st and 2nd sections, dreadnaught 1st and 2nd sections
Plantiod ship set - battlecruiser 3rd section, dreadnaught 3rd section
Mammalian ship set - battlecruiser 3rd section
Mollusciod ship set - battlecruiser 2nd section
Lithoid ship set - battlecruiser 1st and 2nd sections