安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
The blurbs are fun and well-written though, so I'd be happy to resubscribe, assuming we get a performance update
https://github.com/Vanilla-Expanded/VanillaBackstoriesExpanded/pull/1
https://gist.github.com/HugsLibRecordKeeper/715a84a5586465b4b174b69ab0af1db2
im just a bit confused sicne it sound like its a industrial
Since we already have a discussion thread ("Backstory Typos Roundup") pointing out many of the typos in this mod, can we expect those to be fixed? If not, what else could the users do to help expedite this process?
Someone seems to have already done that, actually, in the discussion "Backstory Typos Roundup". The bottom one contains a link, apparently they set it up as a patch and everything. Maybe that will help?