Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
In the game it is more difficult to build bridges and junctions with your highways and I have to delete the entire length of it to make it pretty.
Standard 1-2 tiles wide (2-tile wide median with 2-tile wide road, 1-tile wide median with 2.5-tileish wide highway road.) medians are good and don't take up much space and can be used with standard interchanges from the game or workshop.
You can draw them like this: http://www.reddit.com/r/CitiesSkylines/comments/33qek6/how_to_build_a_parallel_roads_or_highways/
I prefer maps that don't look to be terraformed already. No neat lines of trees, no plots designated for farming, no man-made canals, no flat field for an airport; just the region in its natural state. As for the highway and railway, it should just pass through the region with no provided off-ramps, as if there are no expectations for a city to be built here.
But I'd play a Timbuktu map that was redesigned in such a manner.