Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's an exercise in masochism.
The system simply does not work, managing an army -not even speaking of keeping one which is competitive- is a mess and diplomacy looks like an elaborate dart toss.
I remember once where I was 1875 or so, stars aligned in my favor, 6 subjects, Meiji restored, allied with USA and def allied with Spain; Uk decides they want to take 3 of my mainland states, so I chuckle: "Lol, they are going to be clobbered to dust!"; Russia and Netherlands side with me for free -to my surprise-, and we all lose; despite restarting the war and attempting every possible technique.
A game where Uk can single-handily beat USA, Russia, Spain, Netherlands and developed Japan is not worth to be called: 'game'.
japan is no joke
Yes. So far (1948) I've found it accurate. It doesn't explain the MAPI system, go look elsewhere for that. It means that you should spread out your buildings a bit more.