Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Honestly, you've tried everything I could think of doing, and your results fit with what Reaper reported in the thread I linked to.
Sounds to me like at this point, all we can do is accept EOS, or give up on the game.
I tried offline mode first to at least get single-player working, but again it just refuses to start. If you don't rename the executable, it says "executable not found" because it's looking for DesertsOfKharak.exe (as per the error message).
If you copy and rename either the *64.exe or *32.exe files to try and trick it, it still refuses to start. I didn't make a note of the error - I think it was something about being offline?
Running in online mode immediately validates/updates the game back to the "Epic" version, undoing everything in the process.
I'm completely stumped at this point. If you can get it working, you're a better man than I am lol.
Did you try running it with Steam offline?
The guide does mention having to rename it, and that you should be able to play through Steam. But if it just updates again, maybe trying it with Steam in offline mode would let us play singleplayer, at least.
If you try to start the game through Steam, it's looking for DesertsOfKharak.exe (note the lack of 32/64). If you rename one of the executables to DesertsOfKharak.exe, Steam tries to update the game, undoing your work. I suspect it notices the binary is different somehow (checksum? file size?) and assumes your install is outdated or corrupted...which technically isn't wrong lol.
In an ideal world, someone from Gearbox will read this thread, notice how much we're actively trying to avoid Epic and reverse the changes after seeing the error of their ways. Wishful thinking at it's finest.
Oh well, it was worth a try at least.
Screw it - I'm going to have a go at downloading that older build. I'll let you know how I get on.
Trying to block it tends to break a game, unless it was inactive to begin with (most purely-singleplayer games; though I've recently learned that even those aren't entirely safe - Insurmountable is singleplayer-only, and EOS is active).
An earlier build should work in theory, but someone tried it ( https://sp.zhabite.com/app/281610/discussions/0/3875968426427927800/ ), and apparently it doesn't help.
Not sure what's going on there, and I haven't tested it yet myself, so I can only go by what's been said in that thread.
As far as I know, right now, GOG is the only way to play this game without Epic legitimately. For now. Assuming they don't add EOS to that version too (some games on GOG did get EOS added to them, like Saints Row IV).
Outside of buying the GoG version, or running an earlier build of the game, I don't know how else you can avoid it - unless you have a cracked version of the game that somehow bypasses it.