Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But thank god for the ice pick.
It is not a question of replacing one ruling clique with another, but of changing the very methods of managing the economy and guiding culture. Bureaucratic autocracy must give way to Soviet democracy. The restoration of the right to criticize and real freedom of elections is a necessary condition for the country's further development.
This presupposes the restoration of freedom for Soviet parties, starting with the Bolshevik party, and the revival of trade unions. Transferred to the economy means a radical revision of plans in the interests of the working people. Free discussion of business problems will reduce the overhead of bureaucratic mistakes and zigzags.
>Non-party people are also elected to the Soviets, sometimes there were more of them than party members
...тем не менее, руководящие и многие выборные должности могли занимать только люди из номенклатурных списков, утверждённых партийным цк.