安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I'm not saying that I only like it when everything is rectangular and at right angles, but I prefer it when the map mainly has lines aligned on the grid and moves away from that just for a few sections, like Mirage CT to A, Overpass middle/bathrooms and the T route to B, Inferno banana... do you agree that it has benefits? For me it's easier to understand the entire layout when I know which parts run in parallel. Really curious what you think about this though.
Anyway, sorry for rambling, I want to repeat that I really enjoy this map! And by the way, de_shift is still my number 1 layout that I wish got an HD upgrade and a permanent place in the game haha
In my opinion, I think map layouts are easier to grasp if you can understand where things are placed on the underlying grid, and when lines are parallel to each other. If you have a lot of right angles, it's clearer where paths are relative to each other. T apps totally throws that off, but there's also the entire B side of the map where very few significant lines run parallel to the axes. I don't know if axis alignment is something that mappers are trying to avoid, but I think a certain amount of it is useful to make the map easy to grasp, especially since most CSGO maps work like that. (...)