Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
7 = centimeter (0,393701 in)
6 = decimeter (3,93701 in)
5 = meter (1,09361 yd or 3,28084 ft)
4 = decameter (meter x 10)
3 = hectometer (meter x 100)
2 = kilometer (0,621371 mi)
1 = tens of kilometers (6,21371 mi)
So, given this premise, I assume that the last three figures are negligible and that the most important ones are those in positions 1 to 4. Therefore, I used ### as placeholders, previously on this text.
PS: I apologize for any mistake in my grammar, mainly about my use of prepositions.
- Northern border is located in Y = 204.###
- Southern border is located in Y = 1.817.###
- Western border is located in X = 1.209.###
- Eastern border is located in X = 2.119.###
As it can be seen, there is a discrepancy between theoretical borders and actual ones.
This deviation increases at a yet unknown rate; occurring, i.e., borders at sector 16.19 are W = 1.915.### and S = 1.714.###.
A possible explanation to this phenomenon is in-game map sectors (squares) are larger than 1 x 1 km. My next goal is to measure as accurate as possible size of in-game map sectors (IGMS).
Numbers as listed here don't seem to work???