Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
7 = centimeter (0,393701 in)
6 = decimeter (3,93701 in)
5 = meter (1,09361 yd or 3,28084 ft)
4 = decameter (meter x 10)
3 = hectometer (meter x 100)
2 = kilometer (0,621371 mi)
1 = tens of kilometers (6,21371 mi)
So, given this premise, I assume that the last three figures are negligible and that the most important ones are those in positions 1 to 4. Therefore, I used ### as placeholders, previously on this text.
PS: I apologize for any mistake in my grammar, mainly about my use of prepositions.
- Northern border is located in Y = 204.###
- Southern border is located in Y = 1.817.###
- Western border is located in X = 1.209.###
- Eastern border is located in X = 2.119.###
As it can be seen, there is a discrepancy between theoretical borders and actual ones.
This deviation increases at a yet unknown rate; occurring, i.e., borders at sector 16.19 are W = 1.915.### and S = 1.714.###.
A possible explanation to this phenomenon is in-game map sectors (squares) are larger than 1 x 1 km. My next goal is to measure as accurate as possible size of in-game map sectors (IGMS).
Numbers as listed here don't seem to work???