Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
7 = centimeter (0,393701 in)
6 = decimeter (3,93701 in)
5 = meter (1,09361 yd or 3,28084 ft)
4 = decameter (meter x 10)
3 = hectometer (meter x 100)
2 = kilometer (0,621371 mi)
1 = tens of kilometers (6,21371 mi)
So, given this premise, I assume that the last three figures are negligible and that the most important ones are those in positions 1 to 4. Therefore, I used ### as placeholders, previously on this text.
PS: I apologize for any mistake in my grammar, mainly about my use of prepositions.
- Northern border is located in Y = 204.###
- Southern border is located in Y = 1.817.###
- Western border is located in X = 1.209.###
- Eastern border is located in X = 2.119.###
As it can be seen, there is a discrepancy between theoretical borders and actual ones.
This deviation increases at a yet unknown rate; occurring, i.e., borders at sector 16.19 are W = 1.915.### and S = 1.714.###.
A possible explanation to this phenomenon is in-game map sectors (squares) are larger than 1 x 1 km. My next goal is to measure as accurate as possible size of in-game map sectors (IGMS).
Numbers as listed here don't seem to work???