9
已評論
產品
306
帳戶內
產品

Yorokobe 最近的評論

目前顯示第 1-9 項,共 9 項
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 55.5 小時 (評論時已進行 39.3 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
7DTD + HL
張貼於 2024 年 11 月 28 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
1 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 143.9 小時 (評論時已進行 44.2 小時)
Залип. 3 дня 44 часа.
張貼於 2023 年 12 月 21 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
14 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
8 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 314.6 小時 (評論時已進行 223.1 小時)
Thx for the Kleptomaniac Rats, never doing it again.

10/10 wiki
張貼於 2022 年 8 月 14 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
12 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 38.1 小時 (評論時已進行 30.1 小時)
Needs saves on checkpoints, once the devs add this feature, I will say 8/10.

Right now, 6/10 - some of the levels are sloppily designed, unbalanced, and over-reliant on weapon selection. The later is a good thing (usually), but the weapons themselves are not balanced in terms of damage/supply/etc. You can play with bots, but sometimes they bug out and do not get resupplied or just get stuck in place during the security scan phase (very frequently happens when it is a moving one).

In terms of previously mentioned sloppy level design let me elaborate on one such occasion:
Level C2 of Rundown 6. You have to start up the generators to get rid of the green poisonous gas. Some of the rooms have it, some of them do not. And sometimes, when you open one of the doors (while you have multiple choices of which one to open), there just happens to be a gas leakage which puts gas into rooms which did not have it in the first place. Checkpoints are sometimes too far apart, and a general playthrough of mid-high diffiulty levels solely relies on how those checkpoints were placed (evenly, or absolutely randomly). Such playthroughs may take from 1.5 hours to 5 hours, the latter of which require too much time and dedication to sit in one go.
Yes, the biggest downfall of this game is the absolute complete disregard of the devs towards the player time. You cannot save on a checkpoint to continue on a later day. Nope, Either ruin your sleep and nerves trying and memorizing everything, or just quit with no progress done at all

So yeah, right now, advised only for those who do not value their time or have an exceptional team to coop with.
Just add the saves on checkpoints devs, bruh
張貼於 2022 年 6 月 16 日。 最後編輯於 2022 年 6 月 16 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 1,144.3 小時 (評論時已進行 271.3 小時)
3d Gacha/Farmville
張貼於 2019 年 12 月 10 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 83.4 小時 (評論時已進行 25.1 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
not bad
張貼於 2019 年 7 月 1 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
9 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 608.7 小時 (評論時已進行 347.9 小時)
A decent MMORPG, with many possibilities and good updates/promotions. BUT. A big problem is that the Zenimax Studios does not treat its primary supporters well. I'm talking about the people who bought the TESO game as soon as they could, for a high price almost at the launch date. Those people, have to buy the DLCs, even though they've bought the original game years ago, while the newcomers get the DLCs(currently Morrowind and Summerset soon) for free. Not saying that it is a bad idea to give out the old DLCs to the newcomers as a promotion, but treat people equally, please. If you decide to include any DLCs for free in the base game copy, upgrade the whole base game so that the old supporters don't feel scammed. Would rate 8/10, but since the servers uptime had been fairly unstable and this whole DLC situation, i'd say 6/10
張貼於 2019 年 6 月 26 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 153.8 小時 (評論時已進行 44.2 小時)
Good game

900000000 Chtulchu/ 100000deaths
張貼於 2015 年 6 月 29 日。 最後編輯於 2015 年 6 月 29 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 59.3 小時 (評論時已進行 9.5 小時)
90000/10
Must play
張貼於 2015 年 2 月 2 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前顯示第 1-9 項,共 9 項